***“Calvin is a cataract, a primeval forest, a demonic power, something directly down from Himalaya, absolutely Chinese, strange, mythological; I lack completely the means, the suction cups, even to assimilate this phenomenon, not to speak of presenting it adequately. What I receive is only a thin little stream and what I can then give out again is only a yet thinner extract of this little stream. I could gladly and profitably set myself down and spend all the rest of my life just with Calvin” (Letter to Eduard Thurneysen, June 8, 1922).
The musings of the 36 year old Karl Barth upon acceptance of the Chair in Reformed Theology at Göttingen after his own “bombshell dropped into the playground of the theologians,” his peculiar commentary “The Epistle to the Romans,” made him a star in the theological world.
Do not imagine that acquaintance with Calvin’s disciples or Calvin’s interpreters approaches acquaintance with the man himself. He did not get to be Calvin by spoiling otherwise happy gatherings with fierce debates about predestination and an angry God. Read him for yourself. Start with the Institutes (1559) in the Battles/McNeill edition. You will meet more of yourself there than you expected and you will begin to understand how Barth could become so alternately awestruck and smitten.
1 response so far ↓
Gordon Schultz // Aug 15, 2007 at 12:36 pm
The biggest mistake most people who read (or pretend to read) Calvin, including so-called Calvinists, is to read him through the lens of the Sovereignty of God or predestination, a mistake never made by Karl Barth.
The heart and soul of Calvin’s theology is the unmerited love of God revealed through the grace and mercy of Jesus Christ.
I love to tweak the noses of Lutherans who think they know all about Calvin without reading him, by asking “Who is the greatest of all Lutheran theologians?” After getting the list of usual suspects I slyly whisper: “John Calvin.” LOL
Leave a Comment